🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."